Carlis v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIAN, Judge.
The offense is murder; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for ninety-nine years.
It was charged in the indictment, in substance, that appellant, with malice aforethought, killed Alfred Steinbach by striking him with a blunt instrument, the exact nature of which was to the grand jurors unknown.
The state relied upon circumstantial evidence. In view of our disposition of the case, it is unnecessary to set out the circumstances.
As shown by bill of exception prepared by the court, upon the voir dire examination of the first member of the special venire, appellant asked…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Plair v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Kerley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Reich v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Belcher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- De La Rosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Easley, Damian DemitriusCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Battie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.