Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. Loup River Public Power District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1939No. 30436PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

This action for damages arose out of an application of the Loup River Public Power District, defendant and appellant, to acquire a perpetual right of way easement across lands of the plaintiff by eminent domain for the purpose of erecting a high power transmission line. As a result of the proceedings in the county court, the five appraisers on October 1, 1937, allowed the following sums: $1,500 for damage to farm, $15 for crop damage, and $175 for damage to trees, making a total allowance of $1,690 damages. From this award an appeal was taken to the district court by the defendant power…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kentucky Hydro-Electric Co. v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  2. St. Louis, El Reno & Western Railway Co. v. OliverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  3. Illinois Power & Light Corp. v. PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. O'NeillNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Omaha Southern Railway Co. v. ToddNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wahlgren v. Loup River Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Petition of Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. City of Santa Fe v. KomisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Willsey v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  5. Langdon v. Loup River Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API