Legal Opinion

Commissioners v. A.C.L. Ry.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 15, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

March 15, 1905. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This is an application to the Supreme Court, in the exercise of its original jurisdiction, for a writ of mandamus, compelling the defendant to obey the order of the plaintiffs, requiring it to stop certain trains at its station in the town of Latta, S.C. for the accommodation of passengers. The following is a copy of the petition:

"I. That the said plaintiffs were at the time hereinafter stated, and still are, the qualified Railroad Commissioners of the State of South Carolina.
"II. That the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company was at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. SchmidtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Gladson v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Minnesota Ex Rel. Railroad & Warehouse CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. R. R. Connection CaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Taylor v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. State Ex Rel. Daniel v. Broad River Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  3. Shealy v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  4. Blease v. Charleston & W. C. Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API