Legal Opinion

State v. Heck

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 1991No. 11186PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIVINS, Judge.

The state appeals from a final judgment denying its request for injunctive relief for alleged violations of the New Mexico Subdivision Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 47-6-1 to -29 (Repl.Pamp.1982) (the Act). The state argues on appeal that the district court erred with respect to four of its conclusions of law: (1) that the Act constitutes a criminal statute to be strictly construed against the state; (2) that parcels that are not contiguous or located within a single tract are excluded from the Act; (3) that five sales, none of which results in a default, are necessary within a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Methola v. County of EddyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. LujanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. City of Las VegasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McGarry v. ScottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State Ex Rel. Stratton v. Alto Land & Cattle Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. State Ex Rel. Udall v. CresswellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Montgomery v. United Services Automobile Ass'nNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API