Legal Opinion

Moseley v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 7, 1950No. 32951Published

1Opinion of the CourtWorrill, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The petition shows no contractual relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant insurance company. The plaintiff’s theory of recovery seems to be that the company, by placing in the hands of the patient certain documents and being reasonably bound to anticipate that they might be exhibited to the plaintiff, is estopped to deny that it had issued an insurance policy which would cover the medical and hospitalization expense here involved and is liable therefor. It is apparent that in fact the patient was not protected by any policy as of the date of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  2. Parker v. CrosbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  3. Marietta Fertilizer Co. v. BeckwithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Randolph v. Merchants & Mechanics Banking & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  5. Sawyer v. BirrickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API