Legal Opinion

Randolph v. Merchants & Mechanics Banking & Loan Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 16, 1936No. 10936PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hutcheson, Justice.

It will be observed from the foregoing statement that the bank admits that Eandolph has legal title to the strip of land in controversy, but contends that, by reason of representations made by Eandolph to the tax-assessors and paving-assessors that his lot had a depth on Newport Street of only 110 feet, he is now estopped from asserting that he owns 120 feet. On the hearing there was evidence from certain city officials that Eandolph did make these representations. This was denied by Eandolph, who introduced tax-assessment records which showed that his lot had been assessed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Parker v. CrosbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  3. Wachstein v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Harvey v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Peyton v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kendrick v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  2. Hughes v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  3. Pressley v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  4. Navajo Construction, Inc. v. BrighamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. Owen v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API