Legal Opinion
United States v. Sholam Weiss
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 18, 2006No. 05-13661, 05-13955 and 05-14012PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge:
The Stonewell Corporation (“Stonewell”) appeals from 1) the Summary Judgment in favor of the Government, 2) the Second Amended Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, and 3) the Final Order of Forfeiture, giving the United States the proceeds of the sale of a property known as the Center Mall (“the Center Mall property”). These orders effectuate the District Court’s order on Stonewell’s petition filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1963 (2000).
The District Court determined that Stonewell lacked standing to claim an interest in a mortgage on the Center Mall property (“Center Mall…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Tampa Bay Water v. HDR Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Frank AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Stonewell Corp. v. CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE CO.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.