State v. Columbia Railway, Gas & Electric Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
November 26, 1921. The opinion of the Court was delivered by For all practical purposes this case was tried and determined on demurrer. See 112 S.C. 528;100 S.E., 355. It is enough here to say that it has been decided that the complaint states a cause of action for forfeiture for a breach of condition, and, if the plaintiff has proved its allegations, it is entitled to the judgment sought.
The complaint alleges that the State was, at one time, the owner of the Columbia Canal, and conveyed it away on the condition that the grantees would so complete it; that (112 S.C. 538, 539; 100 S.E., 355),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Lyon v. Columbia Water Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
- State v. Columbia Ry., Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
- State Ex Rel. Lyon v. Columbia Water Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- Vermillion v. Woman's College of Due WestSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
- White v. BrittonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- South Carolina ex rel. Maybank v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Daniel v. Broad River Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- State v. Columbia Railway, Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- State v. Columbia Railway, Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1921