Legal Opinion

State v. Chapman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1982No. 16998PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Defendant/appellant, Gerald D. Chapman, appeals from two felony convictions for Forgery and Making a False or Fraudulent Insurance Claim. On appeal, Chapman claims the trial court committed reversible error in admitting the testimony of two witnesses whom the prosecution claimed were unavailable at the time of trial. The issue we address in this appeal is whether the prosecutor acted in good faith in attempting to secure the attendance at trial of the two witnesses. We hold that the prosecutor did not exhibit good faith in regard to one of the witnesses, and therefore that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Mancusi v. StubbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Berger v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. MontoyaUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. WebbUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Felix Martinez v. George SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API