Bidwell v. Scheele
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
AREND, Associate Justice.
As nearly as we can determine from a record that is far from enlightening and briefs which are very inadequate, the question here presented is this: Did the provision of Section 16-1-131, Alaska Compiled Laws Annotated 1949, 1 which re quired a person claiming to be the owner of specific lands and desiring to litigate the title thereto as against the holder of the tax title to pay into court with his first pleading the amount of taxes for the payment of which the lands were sold, plus taxes paid by the purchaser after the sale, constitute a vested right in the holder…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Collector v. HubbardSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Cassard v. TracySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
- Hartsfield Co. v. ShoafSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Buza v. Columbia Lumber CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Kaho'ohanohano v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. KaatzAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Hammond v. HoffbeckAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.