Legal Opinion

Orsay v. United States Department of Justice

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 14, 2002No. 00-16860PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge HUG; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge D.W. NELSON.

HUG, Circuit Judge.

Deputy United States Marshals David Orsay and Michael Smith (collectively “Appellants”) appeal the district court’s dismissal of their claims under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq. (“FTCA”). The district court held that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to resolve the claims, which the court found preempted by the Civil Service Reform Act (“CSRA”), codified in various sections of Title 5 of the United States Code. The district…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Jeffrey A. Saul v. United States of America Ray Larsen Colleen St. Louis John Doe St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. David Orsay v. United States Department Of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Blaney v. GonzalezDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API