Legal Opinion

Specialty Maintenance & Construction, Inc. v. Rosen Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 24, 1990No. 01-89-00409-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COHEN, Justice.

Specialty Maintenance & Construction, Inc. (“Specialty”) sued Rosen Systems, Inc. (“Rosen”), alleging Rosen violated the Deceptive Trade Practices Act by advertising goods for auction with intent not to sell them as advertised. The trial court rendered a take-nothing judgment, based on the jury verdict that Rosen did not advertise deceptively.

The jury answered question 1(a) as follows:

Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that on the occasion in question Rosen Systems, Inc.:

A) Advertised goods and services with the intent not to sell them as advertised?

The jury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Drew v. John Deere Co. of Syracuse, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  3. Sly v. First Nat. Bank of ScottsboroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Intertex, Inc. v. Cowden, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mabry v. LikeCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. St. Paul Oil & Gas Corp. v. Trijon Exploration, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API