Legal Opinion

In re McPhun

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided March 8, 1887PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Habeas Corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtBitowN, J.

Upon the complaint of the consul general of Great Britain at this port, ttie relator was arrested upon a charge of forgery, alleged to have been committed at Calcutta in April, 1888,' and brought before Commissioner Odborn in proceedings for extradition under article 30 of the treaty of August 9, 1842. Having been held by the commissioner, the relator lias been brought before the court on habeas corpus, together with the proceedings under a writ of certiorari.

Article 10 of the treaty with Groat Britain (8 St. at Largo, -576) provides that tlie persons charged are to be delivered up, “provided…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re KaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  2. Ex parte KaineU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1853
  3. In re HenrichU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1867
  4. In re FarezU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1870
  5. In re Extradition of WadgeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Desmond v. EggersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  2. John Peter Galanis v. Ermen Pallanck, U.S. Marshal for the District of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. GalanisDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
  4. Matter of Extradition of Tang Yee-ChunDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  5. President of United States ex rel. Caputo v. KellyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API