Legal Opinion

Mayfield v. Kerr

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1931No. Appeals 135 and 136PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldbige, J.,

These appeals by an employer . and an insurance carrier from a judgment confirming compensation award raise the single question, whether the deceased stood in loco parentis to the claimant’s children under Section 307 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 26, 1919, P. L. 642.

The claimant filed a petition for her six children to recover compensation for the death of Rudolph Banks, an uncle of the children, on whom, it is averred, they were dependent within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Several years prior to the decedent’s death, the claimant and her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Callihan v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Anderson v. BaxterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Faucett v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Sznitko v. Maher & Graff Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Savic Ex Rel. Bobic v. Pittsburgh Gas Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. D'Auria v. LiposkySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Fitzpatrick v. Hudson Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Renovich v. Bethlehem Mines Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Brovdy v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Koeppel v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API