Legal Opinion

Monsanto Chemical Company v. Edwin R. Payne

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 23, 1966No. 21900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Circuit Judge:

This is a diversity action for the recovery of damages alleged to have been sustained as a proximate result of negligence of the defendant. At the close of plaintiff’s proof, the trial court denied defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. The defendant thereafter offered no proof, but renewed the prior motion, which was again over-ruled. There was a jury verdict for the plaintiff and judgment accordingly. The trial court then denied motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and a new trial. For the reasons hereinafter set out, we reverse.

Plaintiff was employed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Halepeska v. Callihan Interests, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Robert E. McKee, General Contractor v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Houston National Bank v. AdairTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Wesson v. GillespieTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Swift & Co. v. Morgan & SturdivantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. David H. Rosenberg, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. James Trautwein, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Roy Otis Kridler v. Bituminous Casualty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Hanover Insurance Company v. William Fred Berry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Luna v. LunaUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Monsanto Chemical Company v. Edwin R. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API