Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Transportation Insurance & Pecoraro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and application granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the application seeking a permanent stay of arbitration of respondent’s underinsurance motorist claim. Respondent settled his personal injury action against the tortfeasor and tendered a general release without petitioner’s consent in violation of the express terms of the policy. The “failure of [respondent] to obtain such prior consent

*852from [petitioner] constitutes a breach of a condition of the insurance contract and disqualifies [respondent] from availing himself of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Elkowitz v. Farm Family Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. State Farm Automobile Insurance v. BlancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HardinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Collins v. IsaksenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. In re the Arbitration Between State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance & CallistoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & LiberatiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. In re the Arbitration between Central Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API