Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration Between State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance & Callisto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order and judgment reversed on the law without costs and application denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting petitioner’s application to stay arbitration of respondent’s underinsured motorist claim. Petitioner waived its right to insist upon prior written notice of respondent’s settlement with the tortfeasor. An insurer has an obligation to deal in good faith with its insured (see, Matter of Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v Crown, 181 AD2d 883, 884) and may not arbitrarily withhold consent and at the same time argue that its insured has not complied with a condition precedent (see, Matter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mostow v. State Farm Ins. Cos.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. CrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Rajchandra Corp. v. Title Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Tri-State Consumer Insurance v. HundleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Arbitration between Transportation Insurance & PecoraroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API