Legal Opinion

Tagle v. Dept of Homeland Security

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided March 26, 2020No. 2:15-cv-02506Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 VICTOR TAGLE, Case No.: 2:15-cv-02506-APG-VCF 4 Plaintiff Order Denying Pending Motions and Dismissing Case 5 v. [ECF Nos. 140, 146, 148, 149, 151] 6 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, 7 Defendant 8 9 Defendant Department of Homeland Security (DHS) moves to dismiss plaintiff Victor 10 Tagle’s Second Amended Complaint. ECF No. 148. Tagle’s complaint is defective for a variety 11 of reasons, so I grant the motion. 12 The parties are familiar with the facts and procedural posture of this case, so I will not 13 repeat those here except where…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. CivilettiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Ivy Kennedy v. United States Postal Service, Marvin Runyon, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Claudio Arce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Ramallo v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  5. Tesfay v. HolderDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API