Legal Opinion · Dissent

Estate of Lela Barry Vardell, Deceased, First National Bank in Dallas v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 11, 1962No. 19040_1Published

1DissentWisdom, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent.

Until her last expiring breath Mrs. Vardell enjoyed all the economic benefits of the whole of the property: income, possession, management, control, disposition. Until the moment of death she could do with the property as she pleased. Death shifted the economic benefits. Death was the taxable event. The property, therefore, should be included in her estate under the general provision, Section 2033.

No one expects perfect symmetry in the federal estate and gift tax structure. Nevertheless, there are several unifying principles- of such importance that violation of these…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Chase National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Helvering v. ButterworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API