Legal Opinion

Moore v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 29, 2004No. 03-1499CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BLOCK, Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a case involving collateral review of a court-martial conviction where the plaintiff, Mr. David Earl Moore, proceeding pro se, seeks restoration of military pay, allowances, retirement and other benefits. Plaintiff is a former Staff Sergeant in the U.S. Air Force who attacks his court-martial conviction on four counts: (1) plaintiff was denied his Sixth Amendment right to effective counsel; (2) the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (“AFCCA”) denied the plaintiff due process by failing to consider trial counsel’s failure to move to correct…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. White Mountain Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Burns v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. David L. Bowling v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Richard P. Watson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API