Legal Opinion

People v. Cline

California Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1888No. 20341PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSearls, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of grand larceny.

The information was filed April 22, 1886.

A demurrer was interposed, which was properly overruled, on the eleventh day of June, 1886. The trial did not take place until November 22d of the same year.

At the trial, counsel for defendant moved to discharge the defendant upon the ground that said cause had not *576been, brought to trial within sixty days after filing the information. The motion was properly denied.

After the demurrer was overruled, the district attorney asked to have the cause set down for trial. This was objected to by counsel for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. Ah SingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. BencCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. State v. SullivanMontana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Pueblo v. AyalaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1913
  5. State v. JewellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API