Aleshire v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad

The submission is upon a motion to the amended answer of the defendant. The present answer contains some of the matter which the court specifically ruled should be stricken ‘out, and a number of other objections are made, which will be taken up in the order in which they appear.

In the first defense the defendant—

“denies that on the 4th day of January, 1922, the plaintiff in obedience to his instructions attempted to go around the ■rear end of the engine which was being repaired, when he was injured; that it was necessary for the plaintiff to go around said engine to unhook any springs.”

The…