Shears v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSSEY, Judge:
As his sole assignment of error, on appeal from his conviction of Speeding, in Payne County District Court, Case No. T-80-4606, the defendant, David Wayne Shears, argues that any testimony adduced from the radar speed detection device’s readout is incompetent, because the testing devices used in verifying the accuracy of the radar unit had not been proven accurate themselves. This issue is one of first impression in our State.
The arresting officer testified that prior to stopping the defendant for speeding, (his patrol unit’s radar device had registered the defendant’s…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- State v. PrimmCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
- Cantrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
- State v. SnyderNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
- Everight v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. TailoHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
- Jackson v. City of OklahomaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
- Myatt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
- Myatt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
- Village of Algonquin v. SatoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018