Legal Opinion

Manhattan Shirt Co. v. Sarnoff-Irving Hat Stores, Inc.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided April 7, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

As will appear from an examination of the opinion filed on January 17th last, the real and substantial contest in this case was treated to be the one between the complainant and the intervenor, Robert Reis and Company, over the right of the latter to make and vend men’s underwear under the label “Manhattan.” The bill states two grounds of complaint against the original defendants, Sarnoff-Irving» Hat Stores and Mintz, its manager, viz., (a) that they were selling to the retail trade men’s underwear not of the complainant’s manufacture, bearing the label “Manhattan” to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Thaddeus Davids Co. v. Davids Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Manhattan Shirt Co. v. Sarnoff-Irving Hat Stores, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Air Reduction Company v. Airco Supply CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API