Legal Opinion

United States v. Zerilli

District Court, C.D. California

Decided June 15, 1971No. Crim. No. 7574PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*707FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR DISQUALIFICATION AND REASSIGNMENT OF CASE

HAUK, District Judge.

Upon full consideration of the Defendants’ Motions to Disqualify The Honorable A. Andrew Hauk, United States District Judge, as The Trial Judge in The Above-entitled Matter, together with the points and authorities submitted in support thereof, and the opposition of the Government and its supporting points and authorities, and good cause appearing, the aforesaid Judge now makes and enters his findings, conclusions and order as follows:

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

1. Each…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. Ralph 'Whitey' Tropiano, Lawrence R. Pellegrino and William Grasso,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  3. Lowell Lyons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  4. Robert M. Botts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. ZarowitzDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ChamberlinWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. ChamberlinWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. United States v. MitchellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
  4. State v. NeeleyUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Spires v. Hearst Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API