Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Quick

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 23, 2009No. 1071644PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODALL, Justice.

We granted certiorari review to consider a material question of first impression for this Court, namely, how § 15-18-5, Ala. Code 1975, must be applied under the facts of this case. See Rule 39(a)(1)(C), Ala. R.App. P. Wesley Randall Quick filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the St. Clair Circuit Court, alleging that the Department of Corrections had miscalculated the amount of jail time to be credited against his sentences for two counts of first-degree burglary and one count of third-degree burglary. After an evidentia-ry hearing, the trial court granted Quick’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Scott Bridge Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Quick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  3. Prichard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  4. Youngblood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  5. Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tariq-Madyun v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  2. Ex Parte HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  4. Steven Lyle Lay v. State of Alabama.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  5. Ex Parte QuickSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API