Legal Opinion

Robison v. Madsen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1994No. S-92-948PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

After Richard Robison, doing business as Robison Construction, presented evidence and rested in his residential construction lien foreclosure action, the trial court, on motion of the residence’s owners, dismissed Robison’s case because he had failed to prove the amount of his lien.

We affirm the dismissal by the district court for Lancaster County.

ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR

Robison claims that the trial court erred in (1) sustaining the owners’ motion to dismiss on grounds of insufficient evidence of the actual cost of constructing a residence for its owners and (2) overruling Robison’s motion for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lange Industries, Inc. v. Hallam Grain Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Central States Resources, Corp. v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Arpac Corp. v. MurrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Field v. AIM Management Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Goeke v. National Farms, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wisner v. Vandelay Invs., L.L.C.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Linda N. v. William N.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. US West Communications, Inc. v. TaborskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. McLain v. OrtmeierNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Wisner v. Vandelay InvestmentsNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API