Legal Opinion

BECERRA-MIRANDA

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2002No. 1768Published

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #1768 Marna or BECERRA-MIVANDA In Exclusion Proceedings A-13539641 Decided by Board March 1, and August 18,196"7 (1) Where respondent, a lawful permanent resident, departed the United States during the pendency of deportation proceedings against him, returning after a 3-day absence in Mexico, a determination of his status upon return to this country may properly be made in exclusion proceedings under section 236, Immigration And Nationality Act. in which the Government bears the burden of proof (Swong Hal Chew v. Golding, 344 U.S 590, and Hwonp Wei uses) v. Rogers, 257 11'.2d…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Norris v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Rosenberg v. FleutiSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Kwong Hai Chew v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  5. Balbas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API