Legal Opinion

State of Iowa v. Adam Christopher Dahl

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 22, 2016No. 14–2114PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINS, Justice.

A criminal defendant appeals a district court ruling denying his request for an ex parte hearing on the merits of his application for appointment of a private investigator at state expense. We conclude the defendant was entitled to an ex parte hearing on the merits of his application. Accordingly,. we reverse the order of the district court denying the request for an ex parte hearing and remand the case with instructions.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

Adam Dahl’s ex-girlfriend accused him of entering her home and assaulting her. She further complained that he entered her…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. State of Iowa v. Jonas Dorian NeiderbachSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  4. State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  5. State of Iowa v. Iowa District Court for Story CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Brian K. Allison v. State of iowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  2. Cathryn Ann Linn v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  3. State v. WoodNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State of Iowa v. Andrew Lee RussellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  5. Amended August 30, 2017 State of Iowa v. Andrew Lee RussellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API