People v. Rapp

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the language in Michigan State University (MSU) Ordinance, § 15.05 that makes it an offense to “disrupt the normal activity” of a protected person is unconstitutional under City of Houston, Texas v Hill.1 Significantly, the issue of whether the ordinance was unconstitutionally applied *87to defendant for engaging in protected expression is not before this Court. Addressing defendant’s facial challenge, the majority concludes that the overbreadth of the ordinance is so substantial that it must be struck down. The decision to strike down…