Legal Opinion

Elmore v. Sinclair

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 1, 2015No. 12-99003PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order; Opinion by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR.; Concurrence by Judge HURWITZ.

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on en banc rehearing. See Fed. R.App. P. 35(f).

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are denied.

The opinion and concurring opinion filed on April 1, 2015 are hereby amended, and replaced by the amended opinion and amended concurring opinion filed concurrently…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Frank Atwood v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Luke BrugnaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Elmore v. HolbrookSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Gregory Demetrulias v. Ron DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. Mark Rogers v. James DzurendaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API