Legal Opinion
Danishek v. United States
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided November 22, 2024No. 3:23-cv-08131Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Steve Danishek, et al., No. CV-23-08131-PCT-JJT 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 United States of America, 13 Defendant. 14 Several motions are at issue. First, Defendant United States of America filed a 15 Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 90, MSJ), to which pro se Plaintiffs filed a Response 16 (Doc. 95, Response) and Defendant filed a Reply (Doc. 98, Reply). Plaintiffs also filed a 17 sur-reply (Doc. 100), which Defendant moved to strike (Doc. 101). Plaintiffs have 18 conceded the propriety of this motion to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.