Commonwealth Ex Rel. Laughlin v. Green
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Horace Stern,.Two rival groups: of, stockholders maneuvered for places on their company’s board of directors. It would seem that the ultimate object of the majority faction was to eliminate the others from representation, while, on the other , hand, the minority sought to increase its strength on the board. By the strategic device of secretly cumulating their votes on a person whom they had not placed in nomination the minority succeeded, oh the face of the returns, in electing their candidate, — a result challenged by the majority on the ground that, under the by-laws…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Adams v. LansdonIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
- Leonard v. Commonwealth ex rel. CassidySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Lutz v. WebsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- State ex rel. Brady v. BatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Comm'th v. DetwillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sol A. Dann, John H. Neville and Louise A. Turek v. Studebaker-Packard Corporation, Harold E. Churchill, Hugh J. Ferry, and A. J. PortaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Mayer v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Investment Associates, Inc. v. Standard Power & Light Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1946
- Stockholders Committee for Better Management of Erie Technological Products, Inc. v. Erie Technological Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- Twardzik v. SepauleyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.