Legal Opinion
Franklin Square National Bank v. Great Atlantic Building Material Supply Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 1946PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
This is a 'motion by the defendants, other than Frank Loggia, to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency on its face.
Defendant Loggia applied to the plaintiff bank on behalf of the Hamilton Ridge Corporation for an F.H.A. loan. Believing that Loggia was, as he represented himself to be, the president of the corporation, plaintiff gave Loggia cashier’s checks made to the corporation as payee amounting to $2,500, and received in return a promissory note in the amount of $2,874.50, *526to which Loggia signed the corporation’s name. The notes also bore the signatures of Loggia and another individual.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Corn Exchange Bank v. . Nassau BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- First National Bank v. Produce Exchange BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- American Exchange National Bank v. Yorkville BankNew York Supreme Court · 1924
- American Exchange National Bank v. Yorkville BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Franklin Square National Bank v. Great Atlantic Building Material Supply Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- National Surety Corp. v. Federal Reserve BankCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. SzymanskiNew York Supreme Court · 1954