Legal Opinion

Dobrick v. Hathaway

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 1984No. B001878PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FEINERMAN, P. J.

Plaihtiff, Steven G. Dobrick, appeals from an order which: (1) denied his motion to confirm and enter an arbitration award as a final judgment; and (2) dismissed plaintiff’s complaint as to all defendants for failure to bring the matter to trial within the statutorily prescribed time limit. (Code Civ. Proc., § 583, subd. (b).)

The appeal presents the following issues: First, was there substantial evidence sufficient to support a finding that notice of request for trial de novo, following judicial arbitration, was duly served? We find that there was not such evidence.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Matter of the Estate Op Bernard NewManCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Board of Education v. Jack M.California Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Forslund v. ForslundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Morrissey v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lee v. Placer Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Bolkiah v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Simplon Ballpark, LLC v. ScullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. San Diego County Department of Social Services v. WyattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Lum v. Mission Inn Foundation, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API