Legal Opinion
R.M. Kerr v. Commonwealth of PA
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 7, 2018No. 158 F.R. 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY JUDGE COVEY
Robert M. Kerr (Kerr) filed exceptions pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure (Rule) 1571(i) 1 to this Court's July 6, 2017 order affirming the Board of Finance and Revenue's (Board) January 25, 2012 order sustaining the Board of Appeals' (Appeals Board) dismissal of Kerr's Petition for Reassessment (Petition) (Exceptions). The sole issue before the Court is whether the Court erred by concluding that Kerr's Petition was untimely filed. 2 After review, we overrule Kerr's Exceptions.
The procedural posture of this case is undisputed. See Stipulation of Facts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Philadelphia Gas Works Ex Rel. City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- C.E. v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Quest Diagnostics Venture, LLC v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Escofil v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- C. Pedro v. Bureau of Administrative AdjudicationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- D&R Sports, Inc. v. Com. of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020