Legal Opinion

Escofil v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1979No. Appeals, 167 Misc. Dkt. 1976, 2136 C.D. 1977 and 2564 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Bowman,

Petitioner taxpayer, an advocate of the legal theory that the Social Security system as enacted by Congress, in transgressing biblical law, is also violative of the 1st, 13th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, would have us so declare in these tax appeals from assessments imposed by the State taxing authorities upon his Pennsylvania Personal Income Tax liability for the tax years 1973, 1974 and 1976. They are before us by way of appeal from the Board of Finance and Revenue which sustained the taxing authorities in taxpayer’s appeals…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. American Electric Power Service Corporation v. Commonwealth of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Covenco, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API