Legal Opinion
United States v. Montgomery
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 14, 2006No. 05-3263PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Circuit Judge.
The government appeals from the district court’s judgment granting Defendant-Appellee Daniel Montgomery’s motion for judgment of acquittal and vacating the jury’s verdict based on insufficiency of the evidence. The government also eon- tests the district court’s alternative holding that Mr. Montgomery is entitled to a new trial. The government urges this court to reverse and reinstate the jury’s verdict of guilty, directing the district court to sentence Montgomery under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B)(vii). In the alternative, the government argues that if we affirm the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. McKissickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States of America v. Carless JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Carlos Rodriguez-SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. ScullCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Pulido-JacoboCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Accusearch Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. CarnagieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. FerrelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Verizon Wireless (VAW) v. City of Rio Rancho, NMDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.