Lenz v. L.E. Phillips Career Development Center
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentSteinmetz, J.
(dissenting.) I dissent from the majority opinion for the reasons that follow. First, the present case is moot. A case is moot when a final determination has no practical effect upon the existing controversy. State ex rel. McDonald v. Douglas Cty. Cir. Ct., *95100 Wis. 2d 569, 572, 302 N.W.2d 462 (1981). L.W. passed away while his case was pending on appeal. Consequently, a final determination has no practical effect upon L.W.'s controversy. Although this court has the authority to decide an issue when a matter has become moot as to the parties before it, I believe we should not have granted the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Eberhardy v. Circuit Court for Wood CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- State Ex Rel. McDonald v. Circuit Court for Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Fidelity Savings Bank v. AulikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Steiger v. EichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.