Bishop v. Warden, Nevada State Prison
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Thompson, J.:
At issue is whether Bishop’s plea of guilty to robbery should be set aside. His challenge is twofold. First, he contends that the court was obliged to determine his sanity in accordance with NRS 178.415, and that its failure to do so nullifies his conviction. Second, he argues that the prosecutor did not honor a plea bargain agreement, thereby invalidating his conviction. Neither contention has merit.
1. “. . . if doubt shall arise as to the sanity of the defendant, the court shall suspend the trial of the indictment or information . . . until the question of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hollander v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1966
- Langley v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1968
- Thomas v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1977
- Baymon v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- Warden, Nevada State Prison v. ConnerNevada Supreme Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dominick Cacoperdo v. Peter Demosthenes the Attorney General of the State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Hanley v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- Sullivan v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. ShepherdNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- Martin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.