Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Pinto

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1952No. Docket 54, Calendar 44,533PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff for damages resulting from plaintiff’s falling through a hole in the floor of a place of business run by the defendant Pinto.

Defendant Pinto operated a shoe-shining and hat-cleaning business in a leased building on Harper avenue in Detroit, in the back of which were his shoe-shining chairs. He decided to open up and finish the basement of the building and use it for his shoe-shining business. In order to use the basement for that purpose it was necessary to cut a hole through the wood floor and install stairsteps to go into the basement. To cut…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nezworski v. MazanecMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. White v. Herpolsheimer CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Keech v. ClementsMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Lane v. B & J Theatres, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Neal v. Cities Service Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nash v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
  2. LUDLOFF TRADING AS IRVIN LUDLOFF & COMPANY v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  3. Muth v. W. P. Lahey's, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Tavener v. Elk Rapids Rural Agricultural School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Cochran v. PintoMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API