Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Pinto

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1952No. Docket 54, Calendar 44,533Published

1Opinion of the Court

333 Mich. 91 (1952)

52 N.W.2d 611

COCHRAN

v.

PINTO.

Docket No. 54, Calendar No. 44,533.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided April 7, 1952.

John W. Babcock (David A. Goldman, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Alexander, Cholette, Buchanan, Perkins & Conklin, for defendant Veen.

BOYLES, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff for damages resulting from plaintiff's falling through a hole in the floor of a place of business run by the defendant Pinto.

Defendant Pinto operated a shoe-shining and hat-cleaning business in a leased building on Harper avenue in Detroit, in the back of which were his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nezworski v. MazanecMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. White v. Herpolsheimer CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Evans v. OrttenburgerMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Goodman v. Theatre Parking, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Larned v. VanderlindeMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API