Legal Opinion

Holland v. City of Geddes

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKonenkamp, Justice

[¶ 1.] The plaintiffs sued the City of Geddes after water seepage damaged their home. In granting summary judgment for the City, the circuit court ruled that the plaintiffs failed to give timely notice of injury as required by law, and that the limitations period was not tolled by a continuing tort. We reverse because the City’s failure to repair its broken valve was a continuing tort suspending the limitations period until the valve was fixed. Thereafter, the notice was timely.

Background

[¶ 2.] Susan and Larry Holland moved to Geddes, South Dakota, in 1990. Two years later, they rented out…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ward v. CaulkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Kobbeman v. OlesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Curtis v. FirthIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Alberts v. GiebinkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Defnet v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brandt v. County of PenningtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Novak v. McEldowneySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Roberts v. West Virginia American Water Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Purdy v. FlemingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Thorndike v. ThorndikeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API