Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hopkins v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 23, 1928No. 12410Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(dissenting) : I think that the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict should have been granted, and therefore respectfully dissent from the affirmance of the judgment indicated in the opinion of the Chief J ustice, for the reasons which follow.

The action is by the plaintiff, an employee of the defendant oil mill, for damages on account of personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of the negligence of the defendant.

The questions raised by the pleadings and the proceedings in the trial are stated in the opinion of the Chief Justice, and' need not be repeated; also the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Bodie v. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  2. Steele v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  3. Hall v. Northwestern R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  4. Bodie v. Char. & West. Car. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  5. Trimmier v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API