Legal Opinion

Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. v. Elfelt

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 30, 2008No. A07-1758PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge. *

Appellant challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment that reversed the priority of encumbrances as between respondent and a third-party lender and made respondent the primary mortgagee. As a result of this action, appellant’s interest in the property, which occupied a secondary priority position, was terminated. Appellant now argues that (1) the district court committed reversible error by failing to properly consider its status as a bona fide purchaser under Minn.Stat. § 507.34, and (2) respondent is equitably estopped from asserting a claim to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Miller v. HennenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Lindquist v. Household Industrial Finance Co. (In Re Vondall)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  4. Claflin v. Commercial State Bank of Two HarborsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Harbal v. Federal Land Bank of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, and the Class of Beneficiaries, Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 573.02 v. The City of Stillwater, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Slattengren & Sons Properties, LLC v. RTS River Bluff, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  3. Graves v. WaymanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  4. ROA Rochester v. City of ByronCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API