Langston v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Indictment for seduction. Before Judge Henry. Floyd superior court. July term, 1899.
1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.
The only question for decision in this case is whether or not the court erred in overruling a special demurrer to the indictment. It charged the accused with the offense of seducing one Emma Oliver, “by persuasion and promises of marriage, and by other false and fraudulent means.” The main point presented by the demurrer was, that the indictment failed to set forth what were the “ other false and fraudulent means” employed by the accused in accomplishing the alleged seduction. In our judgment, this point was well taken. Section 387 of the Penal Code specifically declares that the offense of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Wood v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
3Cited by15 opinions
- Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Haden v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Raheem v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Barton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.