United States v. Vernard v. Dickson. United States of America v. Stanley Winslow
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
Defendants Dickson and Winslow were charged in a multi-count indictment with violating the federal murder-for-hire statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1952A (Supp.1985), 1 along with conspiracy and attempted murder under provisions of the District of Columbia Code. 2 The government charged that Win-slow, in furtherance of the conspiracy, contacted a supposed “hit man,” and offered to pay him $200 to murder Dickson’s rival in an amorous affair. The “hit man” was in fact an undercover officer of the District of Columbia police force. The officer had provided defendants with a local telephone number…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- National Coal Association v. Donald P. Hodel, U.S. Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- United States v. ParedesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- City of Farmington, New Mexico v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Amoco Production Company, Amoco Gas Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Levine v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1998
- Speakman Company v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Defense Appeal of Minnco, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.