Wilson v. McDaniel
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
Appellants instituted suit to establish their claimed interest in, and for partition of, the 40-acre tract of land here in issue. The present appeal is a sequel to Wilson v. McDaniel, 247 Ark. 1036, 449 S. W. 2d 944, wherein the pertinent facts of this extended litigation are comprehensively detailed. There we reversed a summary judgment for appellees because several material issues of fact were unresolved. The case was remanded, and a trial on the merits resulted in a decree once again favorable to appellees. Hence this appeal.
The land in issue is part of a 240-acre tract…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilson v. McDanielSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. YontsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- Smith v. ScarbroughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
3Cited by6 opinions
- International Harvester Co. v. Burks Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Hartley v. StiborIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Crowder v. CrowderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Corzine v. ForsytheSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Hartley v. StiborIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.