Legal Opinion

Wilson v. McDaniel

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 29, 1971No. 5-5479PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellants instituted suit to establish their claimed interest in, and for partition of, the 40-acre tract of land here in issue. The present appeal is a sequel to Wilson v. McDaniel, 247 Ark. 1036, 449 S. W. 2d 944, wherein the pertinent facts of this extended litigation are comprehensively detailed. There we reversed a summary judgment for appellees because several material issues of fact were unresolved. The case was remanded, and a trial on the merits resulted in a decree once again favorable to appellees. Hence this appeal.

The land in issue is part of a 240-acre tract…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. McDanielSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  2. Consolidation Coal Co. v. YontsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
  3. Smith v. ScarbroughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. v. Burks Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. Hartley v. StiborIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Crowder v. CrowderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Corzine v. ForsytheSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  5. Hartley v. StiborIdaho Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API