Legal Opinion
Fraser v. Williams
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided July 14, 1945No. 1403PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action for alleged infringement of the trade-mark, trade name, and trade brand “RU-EX” and 'also for unfair competition. Defendant by counterclaim makes similar charges against the plaintiffs with reference to his trademark and trade name “RUX.” Both RU-EX and RUX were and are used to designate pharmaceutical products in powder form for the treatment of rheumatism.
The defendant has established by abundant evidence, including documentary, proof, his adoption and use of the name R.U.X. for his product as early as January, 1934, and the continuous use…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Le Blume Import Co. v. CotyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- American Photographic Pub. Co. v. Ziff-Davis Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Moline Plow Co. v. Rock Island Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914
- Raymond v. Royal Baking-Powder Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898
- H. Mueller Meg. Co. v. GlauberCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Preformed Line Products Co. v. Fanner Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1962
- Dill Mfg. Co. v. J. W. Speaker Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1949