Legal Opinion

Burchell v. Capitol City Dairy, Inc.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 24, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEpes, J.

The bill in this case prays for an injunction against Burchell. It contains no other prayer for relief, not even a prayer for general relief. The salient facts determinative of this appeal are as follows:

Michael H. Burchell and Clarence V. Horner had organized and were operating the Loudoun Farms Dairy Company, Incorporated, which was doing a dairy business in the District of Columbia. They owned all its outstanding capital stock, each owning one-half of the stock.

*8They entered into a written contract, dated October 2, 1929, with F. L. Oyster by which they agreed to sell to Oyster all the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cowan v. . FairbrotherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Smith v. BrittenhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Haugen v. SundsethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Palmer v. TomsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Sickles v. LaumanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stoneman v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
  2. Peterson v. Johnson Nut Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Jenson v. OlsonMontana Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Reynolds and Reynolds Co. v. HardeeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
  5. Augustine v. Fischer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API