Burchell v. Capitol City Dairy, Inc.
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtEpes, J.
The bill in this case prays for an injunction against Burchell. It contains no other prayer for relief, not even a prayer for general relief. The salient facts determinative of this appeal are as follows:
Michael H. Burchell and Clarence V. Horner had organized and were operating the Loudoun Farms Dairy Company, Incorporated, which was doing a dairy business in the District of Columbia. They owned all its outstanding capital stock, each owning one-half of the stock.
*8They entered into a written contract, dated October 2, 1929, with F. L. Oyster by which they agreed to sell to Oyster all the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cowan v. . FairbrotherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Smith v. BrittenhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Haugen v. SundsethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Palmer v. TomsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Sickles v. LaumanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stoneman v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- Peterson v. Johnson Nut Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Jenson v. OlsonMontana Supreme Court · 1964
- Reynolds and Reynolds Co. v. HardeeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
- Augustine v. Fischer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1982